Case study
Kalkine App Overhaul
A product-led overhaul of the Kalkine mobile experience focused on information hierarchy, navigation clarity, and faster investor decision-making.
Key outcomes
Case study
A product-led overhaul of the Kalkine mobile experience focused on information hierarchy, navigation clarity, and faster investor decision-making.
Key outcomes
The existing mobile experience had become dense, inconsistent, and harder to scan as more data and actions accumulated. Users could get to the right information, but the path was slower than it needed to be and the interface made key actions feel more complex than the underlying task.
I led a product-led overhaul focused on three things:
This public version keeps the delivery logic and decision framework while leaving out confidential internal detail.
This was a mobile experience used for repeat investor workflows such as checking alerts, scanning watchlists, and reviewing portfolio-related signals. The problem was not lack of functionality. The problem was the cost of understanding what mattered now.
In high-frequency fintech use cases, users are often trying to answer a simple question quickly:
What changed, why does it matter, and what should I do next?
The previous experience made those answers work harder than they should.
Three patterns were getting in the way.
Important signals were mixed with secondary detail. Users had to scan too much before finding the part of the screen that actually influenced a decision.
Alerts, watchlists, and portfolio views were all present, but the product structure did not consistently reflect how frequently those jobs occurred or how quickly users expected to access them.
When similar data blocks behave differently across screens, people slow down. In finance, that hesitation matters because consistency is part of how the product earns credibility.
The redesign effort was structured around a few product outcomes:
The strongest discovery signal came from combining several lightweight sources instead of waiting for one perfect research package.
I used:
A clear pattern emerged: users did not need more information first. They needed a more trustworthy first layer.
The mobile experience was reorganized so the most actionable layer appeared first. Primary signals moved higher, supporting detail became secondary, and repeated patterns were made visually consistent.
The redesign treated alerts, watchlists, and portfolio exploration as primary investor workflows rather than secondary modules. That shift improved wayfinding and reduced the need to remember where an action lived.
A component and pattern pass made repeated UI structures more dependable across the app. That included card structure, labels, spacing, and action placement. The goal was not only aesthetic consistency. It was faster recognition.
Each screen had to make the next likely action more obvious. Users should not have to interpret the interface before they can interpret the market information inside it.
The work was run as a product and delivery effort, not only a visual redesign.
That meant:
This made the redesign easier to ship incrementally and easier to extend after launch.
The strongest outcome was improved clarity. The product became easier to scan, easier to navigate, and easier to trust during repeat-use flows. Internally, the team also gained a more reusable product language for future mobile work.
Public-safe impact signals from the work:
A few principles held up clearly:
If extending the work further, I would keep pushing on: